Q Read the instructions again for the final project due in Week 7. You will earn a small number of points weekly as you work through the milestones, but the majority of the points for this project will be awarded for the Final Project. This week, you are to concentrate on your topic choice. Complete an annotated bibliography for THREE sources this week that go towards your final project (see the attachment below about how to do an annotated bibliography). • Turn this week's three sources as ONE assignment. (You can keep the three annotated bibliographies together in one Word document.) • The instructor will let you know if all or some were approved. • All three of your sources must have: • o an APA formatting for the reference AND o a five-ten sentence summary of what the source is and how it relates to your project (how it supports your persuasive main idea/thesis statement) Please look at your Turnitin report to see if any of your wording is too close to the original source or there are any other issues. This assignment is due by 11:59 pm on Sunday of Week 2. For grading expectations for the final project, please view the attached assignment sheet for the grading rubric. Attachments • Example Annotated Bibliography.pdf Download Example Annotated Bibliography.pdf • HUM 361 Final Presentation.docx Download HUM 361 Final Presentation.docx Rubric Hum 360 Final Project Rubric 200 points (1) Hum 360 Final Project Rubric 200 points (1) Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStarts with a research question that has potential for deep/rich exploration 20 pts EXCELLENT Research question begins presentation and has strong potential for rich exploration of the topic 18.5 pts GOOD Research question begins presentation and has some potential for rich exploration of the topic 17.3 pts ACCEPTABLE Research question begins presentation, but is somewhat limited in terms of exploration of an idea 16 pts MARGINAL Research question begins presentation, but is very limited in terms of exploration of an idea 13.5 pts POOR Project does not begin with a research question 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContains information that broadens/deepens our understanding of the topic (each slide must contain text that communicates the outline of the argument) 20 pts The information used to answer the research question is plentiful, specific and broadens the audience’s understanding (every slide contains text and the argument is very clear) 18.5 pts The information used to answer the research question is somewhat plentiful, specific and broadens the audience’s understanding (every slide contains text and the argument is mostly clear) 17.3 pts The information used to answer the research question is limited in terms of aiding the audience’s understanding (every slide contains text, but the argument is somewhat unclear) 16 pts There is very limited information that helps audience understanding of the topic (not every slide contains text or the argument is mostly not clear) 13.5 pts There is no information that helps audience understanding of the topic (missing text on most slides or the argument is unclear) 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelopment shows clear structure as well as critical thinking and understanding of the topic 20 pts Ideas and evidence focus on the central topic. All ideas are clearly presented and unified. Evidence demonstrates clarity. 18.5 pts Central topic is mostly matched to the evidence. Most of the shows clarity and unity 17.3 pts Ideas are clear. Some ideas address the central theme. Some of the evidence shows unity and clarity. 16 pts Few ideas address central topic. Ideas ramble a little and are difficult to identify. Most evidence does not show clarity or unity. 13.5 pts Evidence does not address the central topic. Ideas are completely divergent from central topic and show no unity or clarity. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources are academic and authors have been vetted for expertise (This includes multimedia) 20 pts All sources are academic and vetted 18.5 pts 4-5 sources are academic and vetted 17.3 pts 3 sources are academic and vetted 16 pts 1-2 sources are academic and vetted 13.5 pts No sources used are not academic or vetted 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources used fulfill criteria defined in the project requirements (print/multimedia) 20 pts All sources fulfill the project requirement criteria 18.5 pts 4-5 sources fulfill the project requirement criteria 17.3 pts 3 sources fulfill the project requirement criteria 16 pts 1-2 sources fulfill the project requirement criteria 13.5 pts No sources fulfill the project requirement criteria 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNVisual aids (one per slide) enhance understanding and insight into the research question 20 pts There are high-quality visual aids and the visual aids really help audience understanding of the topic/research question 18.5 pts There are visual aids and the visual aids help audience understanding the topic/research question 17.3 pts There are somewhat limited visual aids or the visual aids are somewhat limited in helping audience understanding of the topic/research question 16 pts There are very limited visual aids or the visual aids are very limited in helping audience understanding of the topic/research question 13.5 pts There are no visual aids or the visual aids do not aid audience understanding of the topic/research question 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdeas flow smoothly because of the use of transitions 20 pts Ideas are connected very smoothly and the writing is very easy to follow 18.5 pts Ideas are well connected and the writing is easy to follow 17.3 pts Ideas are adequately connected and the writing is somewhat easy to follow 16 pts Ideas connect minimally and the writing is somewhat difficult to follow 13.5 pts Ideas do not connect and the writing is very difficult to follow 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNePresentation is free of MUGs errors and typos 20 pts 0-3 MUGs errors or typos 18.5 pts 4-5 MUGs errors or typos 17.3 pts 6-7 MUGs errors or typos 16 pts 8-9 MUGs errors or typos 13.5 pts >10 MUGs errors or typos 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation is cited according to APA and has a References page 20 pts Presentation completely cited and References page completely populated and correct 18.5 pts Presentation mostly cited and References page mostly populated and correct 17.3 pts Presentation partially cited and References page partially populated and correct 16 pts Presentation minimally cited or missing entries on the References page (either will also force the instructor to escalate your work for an Academic Integrity violation) 13.5 pts Presentation not cited or missing References page (either will also force the instructor to escalate your work for an Academic Integrity violation) 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVoice-over aids audience understand presentation and is professional. 20 pts Voice over completely aids in audience understanding and completely enriches audience experience 18.5 pts Voice over mostly aids in audience understanding and mostly enriches audience experience 17.3 pts Voice over partially aids in audience understanding and partially enriches audience experience 16 pts Voice over does not aid in audience understanding and does not enrich audience experience 13.5 pts No voice over 20 pts Total Points: 200 PreviousNext